Archive for the ‘gay marriage’ Category
Your mother warned you. Don’t put that thing in your mouth. After all, you never know where it has been. Now mom’s wisdom goes beyond the toys at the neighbor’s house. Next time you get a dip of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, you better think twice. Ben and Jerry’s has declared a flavor “Hubby, Hubby” in support of gay marriage. So, when I see a B&J advertisement begetting a phallic ice cream scooper connotation – well, I get very suspicious that the scooper may have some other function besides dipping cream.
What exactly does ice cream have to do with gay marriage? Nothing. Why does the ice cream name only refer to male gay marriage? Shouldn’t there be a “Honey, Bunny” or “Bush, Tush” flavor to represent the female wing of the Homosexual party? Yikes, I forgot “Bush” is a bad word for America hating lefties.
Nonetheless, BENdover Jerry is exploiting the gay community in order to stimulate controversy. They know a certain section of the population (all of us straight folks) would find such a flavor very tasteless. Nowadays there is no better advertisement than free advertisement ejaculated from controversy. What better way to grab some market share by making themselves even more famous.
This sort of marketing is also a form of discrimination. Why not have a flavor that represents polygamist couples? You know, a flavor like “John,Kate,Cathy,Patty.” Forget it. That will not happen because homosexuals are not really interested in equal marriage. They only want marriage to be what they think it should be. Discrimination is used as an argument to support gay marriage. But, when applying the same litmus test to the gay marriage agenda, logic reveals that the self-proclaimed victims are in fact just as guilty.
For this reason, I think that ice cream scooper is really a “pooper scooper.” The homosexual marriage agenda is just full of crap.
House Minority Whip Eric Cantor’s effort to breathe new life in the Republican Party demonstrates exactly what is wrong with the party. Misguided focus and impotent articulation of a definitive message has been the downfall of the modern Republican Party. Now in an effort to rebrand, we are getting more of the same foolishness.
Mr. Cantor does not understand that conservative voters vote based on principle, not politics. Also, we do not surrender to a fight. So, how does Mr. Dantor expect to motivate and inspire by avoiding controversial subjects? When the conflict is removed, so is the principle.
Just give it up and retire already.












































